Low Graphics Version Home | Contact Us | FAQs | Service Request | eLists | Site Map
City of Fullerton
Community Dev
Home ... > 2000 > April 12, 2000
Shortcuts
Downtown
Water Bill Payment
Agendas & Minutes
City Employment
State College & Raymond Grade Separation Updates
City Services
Classes
Emergency Preparedness
Online Services
Permits
Police News
Public Notices
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FULLERTON PLANNING COMMISSION

COUNCIL CHAMBERS - FULLERTON CITY HALL

WEDNESDAY APRIL 12, 2000 7:00 P.M.

CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order by Chairman LeQuire at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Chairman LeQuire, Commissioners Allred, Crane, Godfrey, Sandoval and Simons

ABSENT: Commissioner Munson

STAFF PRESENT: Senior Planner Mullis; Program Planner Linnell; Senior Civil Engineer Wallin and Recording Secretary Stevens

MINUTES:
MOTION by Commissioner Sandoval, seconded and CARRIED unanimously by voting members present, that the Minutes of the March 22, 2000, meeting be APPROVED AS WRITTEN.

7:00 P.M. SESSION

PUBLIC HEARINGS:

ITEM NO. 1
TRACT TR-15982. APPLICANT: GOLD KEY BUILDERS; PROPERTY OWNER: JOANNE MYRTLE SAIGN/HANSON.
Staff report dated April 5, 2000, was presented pertaining to a request to subdivide a 3.10-acre parcel to create five single-family residential lots on property located at the southeast corner of Laguna Road and Euclid Street (R-1-20,000 zone) (Mitigated Negative Declaration) (Continued from January 12 and February 23, 2000).

Senior Planner Mullis reported that access for this project will be provided off of Yuma Way, even though several properties will back up to Euclid Street. As part of this project, Euclid Street will be widened to its ultimate width, a recreational trail will be provided along its edge, and a storm drain will be extended further south. Improvements to Yuma Way will include widening of the street, and the addition of sidewalks. Although a noise study had previously been prepared for this site, the applicant will be asked to update that study as part of the conditions of approval. There is a natural stream on the property, which will require that applicant obtain appropriate permits from the Army Corps of Engineers and California Department of Fish and Game. A geotechnical analysis was prepared for the project, and additional analysis will be required which ensures that there will be no geotechnical liquefaction issues on site.

Staff has received several telephone calls pertaining to this project. During the past week, staff received a call concerning visibility at Euclid Street and Laguna Road, specifically that vehicles fail to stop at the signal when traveling down Euclid Street, and any obstruction at the intersection could create problems for cars proceeding onto Euclid Street from Laguna Road on a green light. Senior Planner Mullis explained that a corner cut-off will provide adequate visibility at this location. She also noted that a resident brought to staff's attention that a barn to the east of the site houses exotic animals, and the resident asked that this information should be disclosed to any future property owners. Staff recommended approval of the request.

Commissioner Simons questioned when Yuma Way was projected to be extended. Senior Planner Mullis explained that should the property to the south of the site develop as residential, staff wanted to ensure that access to those parcels would be from Yuma Way, and not Euclid Street. The owner of the property to the south had previously informed staff that they may wish to construct a board and care facility in the future and, should this occur, access may need to be taken off of Euclid Street.

Commissioner Simons also asked how the noise levels would be mitigated. Senior Planner Mullis stated that the previous noise study indicated that a masonry wall, between eight to ten feet in height along Euclid Street, would mitigate most of the impacts. Staff is asking that the applicant analyze this information to be sure that it would satisfy the proposed project requirements.

Commissioner Crane noted on the grading plan that the area in question was not level, and was concerned that the wall could go as high as 20 feet. Senior Planner Mullis answered that this was not staff's intent, and the wall will be set back further from the street because of the equestrian trail. Staff anticipates that it would be no higher than 10-12 feet; if it is higher than that, staff would request that additional landscaping be added. Commissioner Crane also wished clarification on the types of exotic animals housed on the southeasterly property. The owner of these animals spoke from the audience, and stated that these were farm animals, i.e. horses, llamas, chicken, sheep, and rabbits.

Commissioner Sandoval pointed out on the Initial Study checklist that the surrounding land uses that identify east and west portions of the property, were reversed. Senior Planner Mullis stated that staff would make that correction in the final document.

Senior Civil Engineer Wallin made a correction to the Engineer's letter under Grading and Drainage, third paragraph, adding a condition "that the City will pay back its portion within two years from the date the storm drain is accepted by the City.

Commissioner Simons noted that on page 1 of the Engineer's letter, a seven-foot wide sidewalk is required, but on page 2 under Access and Circulation, it is listed as a four-foot sidewalk. Senior Civil Engineer Wallin clarified that the dedication shall be seven feet, and the sidewalk shall be four feet. Commissioner Simons further expressed concern regarding the "no parking" requirement imposed on Yuma Way.

Public hearing opened.

Brian Thienes, 16800 Valley View Avenue, La Mirada, represented the developer of this project. He reminded the Commission that this was a previously-approved tract map, which had recently expired, and most of the proposed changes were minimal. He stated that the extension of Yuma Way would occur only if the southern property were developed as residential, thus an easement will be provided between the two parcels. Because of the potential for sound problems, all of the proposed homes will be single-story, thus no portion of the home would be elevated above the sound wall. Mature eucalyptus trees will be planted along the horse trail to enhance the area. Regarding the parking issue, Mr. Thienes reported that the homes will have long driveways which can accommodate several vehicles. The no parking requirement was necessary to keep the fire access clear. He also indicated that he had read and concurred with all of the recommended conditions of approval and mitigation measures, including the Engineer's letter.

Commissioner Allred asked what would be necessary to allow parking on the street. Mr. Thienes explained that the street would have to be widened, and this would seriously impact Lots 2 and 3, which are already the narrowest of the five lots, by reducing the floor plans.

Commissioner Godfrey questioned whether there was an approved easement between Lots 3 and 4. Mr. Thienes said that there is an easement for utilities, ingress and egress, as stated on the plans, which will be kept active until the southern property is developed.

Gardner O'Brien, President of the North Fullerton Homeowners Association, 1100 West Las Palmas Drive, passed out information to the commissioners, which had been discussed at their recent meeting. The issues of most concern were: (1) line of sight; (2) the property traverses a natural stream bed; (3) the existence of the neighborhood farm; (4) the height of the soundproof wall, as well as graffiti prevention measures; and (5) because of the dumping which has occurred on site, residents fear soil contamination.

Mike Faulkner, 952 Paloma Place, emphasized the need for on-street parking, as well as access for those property owners who back up to Yuma Way. He added that he is the property owner with the farm animals, and would like this information disclosed to future buyers of the proposed development.

Kathy Lancaster, 901 Paloma Place, asked that the existing zoning be maintained, and did not feel that a board and care facility would be compatible in this area. She also suggested that the property owner may wish to gift the property to the City to be utilized as a park.

Jean Esslinger, who lives on Paloma Place, reiterated that the residents wish the area to remain as is, with regard to lot sizes and square footage of the proposed residences.

Creed Rucker, lives on Yuma Way, and would like to see the street widened to allow adequate passage for vehicles, plus additional parking.

Otto Kahn, owns the strawberry patch to the south, and stated that he had met with the developer who had been uncooperative and unwilling to listen to Mr. Kahn's suggestions.

Mike Fisher, 2240 Yuma Way, stated that parking has been an on-going problem on this street, and access is also difficult. While supportive of some type of noise reduction, he was concerned the aesthetics of a tall sound wall, and felt that maybe an earthen berm would be more appropriate.

Peter Williams, 2250 Yuma Way, also stated that some type of parking must be allowed on Yuma Way.

Brian Thienes, applicant, again spoke regarding the concerns of the neighbors. He assured those in attendance that the sound wall would not be over 10 feet in height, and would be enhanced with landscaping. Regarding the parking issue, he asked staff if it might be possible to park on at least one side of Yuma Way; nevertheless all off-site parking requirements would be met. With any street widening projects, a line-of-site study will be conducted, and any Army Corps of Engineers and California Fish & Game permits would be obtained. Regarding Mr. Kahn's comments, he indicated that there was a discrepancy as to where the storm drain would be placed, and Mr. Kahn was unwilling to give an easement. Access trail to the property was discussed with the City's Community Services Department, and it was decided that the horse trail should remain on Euclid Street as per the General Plan. Finally, the lots and styles of the proposed homes would be consistent with existing residences.

Commissioner Simons asked if an earthen berm for noise reduction had been considered. Mr. Thienes answered that because of the close proximity to Euclid Street, a block wall should be provided for security purposes. He emphasized that landscaping and mature trees would be planted so the wall would not be visible. Commissioner Simons further inquired if there was any contaminated soil on site because of the dumping which had occurred. Mr. Thienes replied that although there was nothing conclusive from the Phase I study, the soils engineer had found a slight trace of a petroleum contaminant, which will be mitigated on site during grading, or hauled away.

Senior Civil Engineer Wallin stated at this time that the concept of the landscaping element on the outside of the block wall had not been agreed upon. This was because there will be no homeowner's association, and it would be uncertain as to who would maintain the landscaping on the street side of the wall.

Commissioner Godfrey inquired if the developer had considered forming a homeowner's association to maintain any landscaping around the wall. Mr. Thienes stated that the original plan had a five-foot buffer between the edge of the horse trail and wall, and a five-foot landscaped belt between the wall and the horse rail. They felt that if they moved the wall five feet over and only planted trees, it would be easier for the property owner to maintain just the trees. Commissioner Godfrey reminded the developer that the issue of maintenance must be discussed and resolved.

Public hearing closed.

Commissioner Godfrey questioned whether the code allows the animals previously-mentioned on R-1-20,000 property, and if it would need to be specifically disclosed. Senior Planner Mullis informed him that usually this type of information would be the responsibility of the real estate agent, and would not need to be conditioned as part of the approval process.

Commissioner Crane noticed from visiting the site that most of the surrounding streets do allow on-street parking. He asked how wide the streets were in this area. Senior Civil Engineer Wallin answered that the minimum street standard for parking on both sides is 36 feet; on private streets, the code allows this to be reduced to 32 feet, curb to curb, for parking on one side, and 28 feet, curb to curb, for no parking.

Chairman LeQuire asked if it would be possible to allow parking at Lots 1 and 2, which are the largest of the five lots, and then transition the street down to a narrower width with no parking beyond that point. Senior Civil Engineer Wallin replied that the City was only taking an easement for sidewalks, so the lots would meet zoning requirements. If more dedication were taken for street purposes along Lots 1 and 2, this would reduce them to below the 20,000-foot zoning designation. There was a possibility of creating "parking pockets" along the entire length of the street, to allow the lots to remain the same size.

MOTION by Commissioner Simons, seconded and CARRIED unanimously by voting members present, that the Negative Declaration be CERTIFIED.

Commissioner Simons' concerns were: (1) disclosure of the farm animals be added as a condition of approval; (2) the size of the proposed homes must be one story; (3) some kind of parking should be made available on Yuma Way, and (4) an enforceable maintenance agreement for the trees and landscaping on the Euclid Street side of the wall be prepared. Commissioner Crane concurred and added that he desired to see another condition requiring a decorative wall, subject to approval by the Director of Development Services.

Commissioner Allred, while supportive of the project itself, could not support staff's recommendation for approval, without allowing on-street parking on Yuma Way.

Commissioner Godfrey advised that adding a condition requiring the disclosure of the farm animals, would be difficult to enforce. He also did not feel it was necessary to include a condition specifying the type of wall, as this would normally be part of the site plan review process. He was concerned about the width of the street for fire access, parking, etc., and could not support approval of the project.

Commissioner Simons suggested that forming a homeowner's association could be added as a condition of approval, or specifically condition that the maintenance shall be provided by the homeowners.

Commissioner Crane questioned whether a condition of approval could be added stating that all homes shall be built as one-story. Commissioner Godfrey felt that this would be unconstitutional, as would the disclosure of the farm animals. Commissioner Sandoval concurred, and added that she too would not support the project unless parking were allowed on Yuma Way.

Chairman LeQuire also could not support the project without benefit of on-street parking.

Because of Commission concern for lack of parking, Chairman LeQuire suggested that the matter be continued. Commissioner Godfrey suggested that staff and the applicant meet briefly at this point to discuss the matter.

Senior Planner Mullis stated that the applicant indicated he desired to widen the street to 34 feet, divide the parking required, and eliminate the sidewalk along the street. Chairman LeQuire granted a five-minute recess to allow staff and the applicant time to study the issue.

Chairman LeQuire reconvened the meeting. Because of unresolved issues, Commissioner Simons moved that this item be CONTINUED until the April 26, 2000, meeting, 4:00 p.m. session. Chairman LeQuire asked if the applicant concurred, and Mr. Thienes answered affirmatively. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Godfrey and CARRIED unanimously by voting members present.

Commissioner Allred requested that any information which needs to be reviewed by staff concerning this matter, be distributed to the Commission as soon as possible. She explained that it was difficult for the Commission to read information that is handed out during a meeting.

Commissioner Godfrey suggested that a courtesy notice be mailed to affected property owners, informing them of the continuance date. Senior Planner Mullis indicated that staff would do so.

ITEM NO. 2
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP-1020. APPLICANT: STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY; PROPERTY OWNER: CHEN NAN SONG
Staff report dated April 6, 2000, was presented pertaining to a request to allow a coffee house (Starbuck's Coffee) in a multi-tenant commercial center under a joint-use parking arrangement, on property located at 101 West Orangethorpe Avenue (northwest corner of Orangethorpe Avenue and Harbor Boulevard) (C-2 zone) (Categorically exempt under Class 32 of CEQA Guidelines). A vicinity sketch was displayed.

Program Planner Linnell reported that the request entails utilizing approximately 1600 square feet of the existing Blockbuster Video store for the coffeehouse. A conditional use permit is required to accommodate the parking for the proposed use. The applicant submitted a parking study to staff, which shows that ample parking is available (74 spaces in the center). Staff notified all tenants in the center of the project, and was contacted by one tenant. Staff recommended approval of the request, subject to a six-month review of the operation.

Commissioner Crane inquired what course of action would be taken if, after a six-month review, it was found that parking was a problem with the proposed use. Program Planner Linnell replied that the matter would be brought back to the Commission for review, but added that because Starbuck's peak demand times are after normal business hours, there should not be a problem.

Commissioner Simons asked if a handicapped parking space would be provided, and Program Planner Linnell assured him that this would be a Building Department requirement.

Public hearing opened.

Steven Ishino, 17700 Newhope Street, Fountain Valley, represented Starbucks Coffee Company. He made himself available for questions by the Commission. Chairman LeQuire asked if applicant concurred with the six-month review, and Mr. Ishino answered affirmatively.

Public hearing closed.

Chairman LeQuire did not favor a six-month review, but supported the project. There was a consensus of the Commission for approval. The title of Resolution No. 6869 APPROVING a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Starbucks Coffee in a multi-tenant commercial center under a joint use parking arrangement on property located at 101 West Orangethorpe Avenue, was read and further reading was waived. MOTION by Commissioner Godfrey, seconded and CARRIED unanimously by voting members present, that said Resolution be ADOPTED AS WRITTEN.

ITEM NO. 3
ABANDONMENT AB-00-1. APPLICANT: MUSSER ARCHITECTS, INC.; PROPERTY OWNER: SUMMERWOOD APARTMENTS.
Staff report dated April 5, 2000, was presented pertaining to a request to abandon the vehicular access rights to a 30-foot section along the northeasterly line of the 3200 block of Yorba Linda Boulevard in front of the Summerwood Apartments (C-3 zone) (Categorically exempt under Class 3b of CEQA Guidelines).

Senior Civil Engineer Wallin reported that he had received numerous calls on this item, particularly because the general public was unaware of the meaning of "vehicular access rights." He explained that these were imaginary lines which stop cars from crossing into the street, particularly on arterial streets when there is secondary access, to limit the points of access. When the apartments were developed, the property owner dedicated their right to place more driveways along Yorba Linda Boulevard. After discussion with the property owner, staff concurred that 30 feet of this imaginary line along Yorba Linda Boulevard be abandoned so that a new driveway may be constructed.

Commissioner Simons asked for the location of the driveway. Senior Civil Engineer answered that an existing parking lot has its access off the signal at the far west of property. The applicant is proposing to place a new driveway at the easterly end of the parking lot, which would give access to approximately twelve parking spaces. A raised curb with a fence will separate the two parking lots. An overhead of the proposed driveway, with parking, was displayed.

Commissioner Crane noted that there did not appear to be a turnaround area at the end of the proposed parking lot for the twelve spaces. Senior Civil Engineer Wallin assured him that the approved layout would provide a turnaround area.

Public hearing opened.

Jerry Encarnacion, project manager for Musser Architects, clarified that the turnaround area had been discussed, and a revised plan was prepared depicting an approved layout.

Public hearing closed.

There was a consensus of the Commission for approval. The title of Resolution No. 6870 RECOMMENDING to the City Council the abandonment of the vehicular access rights to a 30-foot section along the northerly line of the 3200 block of Yorba Linda Boulevard in front of the Summerwood Apartments, was read and further reading was waived. MOTION by Commissioner Sandoval, seconded and CARRIED unanimously by voting members present, that said Resolution be ADOPTED AS WRITTEN.

ITEM NO. 4
ZONING CODE UPDATE. CITY OF FULLERTON.
Staff report dated April 6, 2000, was presented pertaining to review and comment on a draft of proposed revisions to the following chapters of the Fullerton Zoning Ordinance: Noise Control and Sign Code.

Program Planner Linnell reported that this was the last Commission review of the Zoning Code update. He explained that the proposed changes were not substantial in content, but made for clarity and ease of reading. The sign ordinance was made more detailed, and it would make it easier for applicants and contractors to obtain sign permits.

Chairman LeQuire questioned whether a grandfather clause was provided for an existing non-conforming sign for a commercial property. Program Planner Linnell answered affirmatively.

Commissioner Simons asked if the sign code would apply to real estate or political signs, and Program Planner Linnell answered that real estate signs are regulated by the Code, but political signs are not.

Commissioner Sandoval noted that the staff report states that noise from vehicular traffic is exempt from the regulations within the noise chapter, however new residential development must be designed to address this issue. Program Planner Linnell explained that there is a section of the residential development standards that requires new residential development to take whatever mitigation measures are necessary to ensure noise levels are reduced to an acceptable level. Senior Planner Mullis added that the standards in the Noise Ordinance are related to stationary noise producers, such as industrial businesses.

Commissioner Sandoval also asked if the City Council had adopted guidelines for A-frame signs, and Program Planner Linnell answered negatively.

Commissioner Godfrey suggested that many problems experienced with election/campaign signs could be eliminated, if a permit were required. He recommended that letter (f) be removed from Section 15.49.060 "Sign Permits Required" under the Subsection A requirement, page 17. It would be beneficial to city staff because a responsible person, and telephone number, would be on the application, so contact could be made, if needed. In addition, a regulation of when these types of signs could be put up, and when they must be removed, could also be included. The remaining Commissioners concurred.

OTHER MATTERS

ITEM A
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION
The title of Resolution No. 6871 DECLARING the Planning Commission's intention to consider amending Title 15 of the Fullerton Municipal Code to add Chapter 15.58 entitled "Special Events on Private Property" and to eliminate a corresponding section in Chapter 15.30, was read and further reading was waived. MOTION by Commissioner Godfrey, seconded and CARRIED unanimously by voting members present that said Resolution be ADOPTED AS WRITTEN.
REVIEW OF COUNCIL ACTIONS
Chairman LeQuire reported that the Fire Emergency Services plan was reviewed and approved by the City Council at its previous meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There was no one present who wished to speak on any matter within the Commission's jurisdiction.
AGENDA FORECAST
The next regularly-scheduled meeting will be April 26, 2000, at 4:00 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:26 p.m.
Becky Stevens
Recording Secretary
FacebookTwitterYouTube
RSS for Fullerton NewsFullerton eLists
Home | Contact Us | FAQs | Service Request | eLists | Site Map | Disclaimer & Privacy PolicyCopyright © 2000 - 2014 Community. Development, 303 W. Commonwealth Ave., Fullerton, CA 92832. 714-738-6547